The Evaluation Paper

 

Process

Prewriting, researching, drafting, revising, editing. You will write the bulk of this paper on your own, but your group and I can provide significant feedback on drafts.

 

Length

Somewhere in the 4-6 page range, excluding references, but I don’t like to think in terms of paper length. In my opinion, that’s putting the cart before the horse.

 

Research

I expect you to find at least six "valid" sources relevant to your research interest. You will use at least three of these in your paper.

 

Final Form

All lines in the paper are double-spaced. No single spacing anywhere in the text. In the upper left of the first page you will have this header:

 

Name
 
Course
 
Instructor

 Date

Then the Title--No Special Formatting like Boldface or Italics, and Capitalize Main Words
 

Font should be 12 point and some time of serif (Times is a good choice). All margins, except for the page header, are 1". The page header will be 1/2" from the top and flush right. It should be your last name, a space, and the page number.

For conferences, you should bring hard copies of your draft. If you want me to see a draft before conference time, send it to me via e-mail. Final drafts will be sent electronically on the due date.

Due Dates

These aren’t in stone, but right now I think the rough draft will be due on

February 11

and the final draft will be submitted on

March 2

So I assume we will have conferences on

February 15, 16, and 17

 

 

Criteria for Evaluation of the Evaluation Paper

 

1. The writer has a thesis that is clearly stated and appropriately qualified.

 

2. The writer shows clear standards of judgment that the audience can relate to.

 

3. The writer clearly presents the subject and asserts an overall judgment (thesis).

 

4. The writer provides reasons and supporting evidence that are effective for the given audience.

 

5. The writer establishes credibility through selective use of sources.

 

6. The writer’s viewpoint is consistent throughout the paper.

 

7. The writer uses a lively and appropriate style.

 

8. The essay follows the conventions of Standard Written English.

 

9. The writer has submitted quality planning assignments and peer reviews.

 

 
Overview of the Process

 

1. Brainstorm to develop a sub-topic from one of the five general media areas I’ve given you:

 

 

2. In class, we’ll talk about sub-topics. When you feel that your topic/slant is appropriate, you can start work in the library. We’ll cover guidelines for appropriate research.

 

3. I expect to see photocopies of your sources.

 

4. On the date rough drafts are submitted, you should bring enough hard copies of your draft so I and everyone in your group can have one. (For groups of five, you should have six copies (one for you); for groups of four, five copies.)
 

5. On Peer Review Day--get written responses from all your group members to these seven areas:

 

Peer Response Guide

 

 

 

 

 
Discovering a Subject and Rhetorical Situation for the Evaluation Paper

 

1. Start by LISTING possible subjects (see the categories on the previous page). Make it as

long as possible. Get that pen/pencil moving.

 

2. Put an asterisk by the two or three that you’re most interested in. They might be interesting

because you have some strong feelings about them. (We’ll talk about this.)

 

3. Plot out the DISSONANCE (a big topic we’ll cover) and ask a GUIDING QUESTION.

 

Dissonance is the gap between your values and expectations and "reality."

 

Example:

 

The Three Stooges
 
                                I appreciate the social          ¹            Most people
                              implications of                                    just see them as
                              lots of their work                                simple slapstick
 
                              So I see them as                 ¹             But very few would/do
                              something more than                           buy that.
                              "popular" entertainment

 
Guiding Question(s): What is it in the Three Stooges that really makes me think

they're more than simply slapstick? What are their "deeper" merits? Why do

others not see these characteristics?
 

(Notice these are open-ended questions, and they’re "objective." That is, I

could come to the conclusion that there really isn’t much "artistic" merit to

the Stooges, if that’s what my research indicates.)
 

Audience and Form (possibilities):

 1. A presentation for A&S "Faculty Shop Talk"

2. An essay that I could send to people who maintain various Three Stooges pages on

the World Wide Web. Ask them to include in on the page.

3. I could submit a proposal to read a paper at some conference on popular culture.