Christian Ethics
Racial and Gender Discrimination
Definition
- Discrimination per se--neither good nor bad
- total egalitarianism is impossible and imprudent
- generally, discrimination is an act of prudence when based upon characteristics relevant to the task and which does not disadvantage someone of inappropriate reasons
- the moral issue--does the choice cause negative consequences for irrelevant reasons; can this be justified?
- often this question is difficult to answer, due to 1) history of discrimination and 2)
Institutional favoring of one group.
- moral assumptions:
- the universalizeablity of treating all people with dignity
- the destructiveness of basing moral action on hate
- the necessity of justice; Aristotle's distinction between "distributive justice" and "rectificatory justice"
- Affirmative Action--a test case
I. Moral Arguments For and Against Affirmative Action
- National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A., "On Racial Justice"
- everyone is made in the image of God
- racism is idolatry
- racism--prejudice plus power
- institutional racism--preserves racism
- economic racism--disadvantages particular races
- racism still exists
- if the Church is silent about it, the Church promotes it
- economics is the heart of racism today
- still racism in civil rights, education
- has damaged the Black family
- the Church--Her Benediction--pray and work for social justice and the elimination of racism
- Charles Murray, "Affirmative Racism"
- brief history of Affirmative Action
- 1965--LBJ tried to recruit more Blacks
- 1970--federal courts granted quotas
- 1971--elimination of discriminatory minimum standards
- 1972--Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Affirmative Action creates a new brand of racism--perpetuates the impression of inferiority; supports "old racism" ("I told you they were inferior")
- The consequence of A.A. are self-defeating
- Michael E. Levin, "Is Racial Discrimination Special?"
- reverse discrimination--the favoring of a group on the grounds that past members of the group suffered discrimination
- this makes a moral distinction on morally irrelevant grounds
- the principle is too capricious to be just and has socially disastrous consequences
- only trying to rectify past racial discrimination is too arbitrary
- there are worse past wrongs--e.g., murder, war
- Carl Wellman, "Preferential Admissions" in Morals and Ethics
- the moral principle of the "right of recipience" requires a "correlative duty"
- Blacks have been discriminated against; they have a "right of recipience"; the question then is who has the "correlative duty?"
- the duty falls on those who have been privileged by the disadvantages to the Blacks
- a "correlative duty" is preferential admission into universities
- this duty cannot be justified as a retrospective correction; it's justified as a "prospective correction"
- cannot know enough about the past to corrects its problems
- can control the future; hence must stop discrimination against Blacks